© 2024 Boise State Public Radio
NPR in Idaho
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations
Idaho's state-run health insurance exchange is expected to begin enrollment by Oct. 1, 2013 and fully functional by Jan. 1, 2014. The exchange is an online marketplace where Idahoans will be able to shop for and purchase health insurance. The Idaho Legislature approved plans to build the exchange in March 2013, but two years of intense debate preceded the vote.After the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the Obama Administration's federal health care overhaul in 2012, two key decisions rested with states. One, should states expand Medicaid to include more people? Two, should states create their own health insurance exchanges?Gov. C.L. "Butch" Otter chose not to make a snap judgement, instead, he created a work group to study whether Idaho should create it's own health insurance exchange, let the federal government create one for the state, or some combination of the two options.Otter's 14-member panel decided in October 2012 that Idaho should move forward with creating it's own exchange. The governor followed suit, and Gov. Otter issued a statement on Dec. 11, 2012 that Idaho should create a state-based exchange. Two Years Of DebateThe health insurance exchange debate has been ongoing ever since it became clear an exchange would be part of the federal health care reform package which was signed into law in 2010.Because Idaho didn't have the framework set up for a health insurance exchange, it was expected to be one of the biggest debates of the 2012 legislative sessionThe Associated Press held a special discussion of the issue during its January 2012 legislative preview. In a series of interviews that StateImpact conducted in December, legislator after legislator predicted it would be a defining issue of the months ahead.Instead, it was more or less dead on arrival. Not even a plan developed by Sen. Dean Cameron (R-Rupert) and Rep. Fred Wood (R-Burley) for a stripped-down, state-run exchange could muster sufficient support.Health insurance exchanges are a primary component of the Affordable Care Act. By their most basic description, exchanges are organizations — essentially online marketplaces — intended to make health insurance options more clear and, thereby, more competitive.The underlying logic is this: individuals and small businesses don’t have perfect information or a great deal of bargaining power with insurers. A health insurance exchange lays out the private and public health insurance options, explaining plans in terms of benefits and costs.Under the Affordable Care Act, states can create their own exchanges or wait for the federal government to do it for them.Rep. Wood says it was ideological opposition to the health care law that did in the prospects for a state-run exchange. “I think there was a certain number of people that simply didn’t want anything to do with an exchange,” he said. “And they were in a position that they could affect that outcome. In other words: no exchange.”Wood, a retired physician and former director of the Cassia Regional Medical Center, believes state lawmakers are rolling the dice, hoping the federal health care law will be overturned. “They’re betting that the Supreme Court will strike down the entire law,” he said. “And if we bet the wrong way, it could be very costly for the state.”Costly because states creating their own exchanges will have some discretion to set the essential benefits that must be provided by insurers. But states falling under the federal plan likely won’t have that same flexibility. The Idaho Department of Insurance has predicted Idaho employers could expect to pay millions more in health care costs under a federal exchange.

Idaho Health Exchange Will Keep Taxpayer Funded Contract Review Secret

health insurance exchange

Board members of the Idaho health insurance exchange said Tuesday that they will keep secret the findings of a $15,000 taxpayer-funded investigation into how one of its own members won a lucrative no-bid contract.

Your Health Idaho board chairman Stephen Weeg said the two-week-long review by a private lawyer uncovered "lapses in judgment," though nothing illegal. Exchange executive director Amy Dowd last month awarded a technology contract worth up to $375,000 to board member Frank Chan, who quit the same day the contract was announced.

Dowd gave Chan the contract without advertising it or allowing others to compete. It was later canceled after House Speaker Scott Bedke, R-Oakley, joined critics who called Dowd's deal with an exchange insider "indefensible."

Dowd said Tuesday that she thinks the review's recommendations will help and is looking forward to moving ahead.

Meanwhile, Boise lawyer Frederick Mack was hired to scrutinize the deal. He presented his report Tuesday during a three-hour, closed-door exchange board meeting at the Idaho Capitol.

"The key finding was: We violated no law, that lapses of judgment were made around the procurement policy and conflict-of-interest policy," Weeg said following the meeting. "He had recommendations for us to move forward as an organization."

However, Weeg said the public will never be able to see Mack's recommendations or findings.

"It deals with personnel, and it's done under attorney-client privilege," said Weeg, a retired Pocatello health care industry executive who heads up the volunteer board. He declined to detail the judgment lapses Mack found or who committed them.

"I'm not going to talk about that," Weeg said. "The key is, how do we move forward, rather than how do we point fingers. ... Sure, we stumbled. But we want to minimize the number of stumbles."

Idaho's online exchange is part of President Barack Obama's program to provide federally subsidized health insurance to more Americans.

Like exchanges across the country, Idaho's version has struggled to enroll participants, in part because of frustrating glitches in the federal software system seen since its launch on Oct. 1.

The $180-per-hour deal Dowd struck with Chan on Oct. 16 was to oversee Idaho's effort to replace the federal software with a program of its own. The deal came without board approval.

Chan quit the board and his contract was canceled, but the 18-member panel curtailed Dowd's powers to award contracts without its approval. The board also updated rules preventing members like Chan from capitalizing on their ties to win exchange-related work.

Despite these distractions, Dowd said Tuesday that she doesn't believe they have delayed the goal of having Idaho's in-house enrollment system completed by next October.

To complete that project, Idaho aims to use a pending $50 million federal grant, on top of a $20 million grant the exchange has already received.

"There hasn't been any delay to our technology procurement," Dowd said, adding that she believes Mack's undisclosed recommendations will help staff and board members make good decisions in the future. "I'm very much looking forward to focusing all of our attention now on moving ahead."

As that happens, Dowd, who earns $175,000 annually for her role heading the exchange, will be subject to additional scrutiny.

That's after exchange board members on Tuesday created a new "personnel committee" that, among other things, plans to address questions like appropriate compensation.

Much of this new committee's work, like Mack's investigation, will be also kept from public view, Weeg said, given the board's need to protect employee confidentiality.

You make stories like this possible.

The biggest portion of Boise State Public Radio's funding comes from readers like you who value fact-based journalism and trustworthy information.

Your donation today helps make our local reporting free for our entire community.