© 2026 Boise State Public Radio
NPR in Idaho
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations
Amber and Rachael filed their lawsuit against Idaho in Nov. 2013. They were married Oct. 15, 2014.In November 2013, eight women -- four couples -- sued the state of Idaho over its 2006 voter-approved constitutional amendment that defines marriage as between one man and one woman.The plaintiffs, Susan Latta and Traci Ehlers, Lori Watsen and Sharene Watsen, Shelia Robertson and Andrea Altmayer, and Amber Beierle and Rachael Robertson, say Idaho's ban on same-sex marriage violates equal protection and due process guarantees.Two of the couples have been legally married in other states and two have tried to get Idaho marriage licenses and been denied.Their case went to U.S. Magistrate Judge Candy Dale in May 2014. On May 13, eight days after Dale heard the case, she struck down Idaho's same-sex marriage ban.Idaho Gov. C.L. "Butch" Otter and Attorney General Lawrence Wasden appealed that ruling in an effort to uphold Idaho's Constitution as approved by voters in 2006.On Oct. 7, 2014, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Dale's ruling, striking down Idaho's ban on same-sex marriage. After more than a week of legal challenges, same-sex marriages began Oct. 15, 2014 in Idaho.

9th Circuit Court Stops Gay Marriages From Beginning In Idaho

Emilie Ritter Saunders
/
Boise State Public Radio

This post was updated at 5:00 p.m. May 15.

Same-sex weddings likely won't begin Friday morning in Idaho. The Idaho Statesman reports the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has granted a temporary stay of a lower court's ruling striking down Idaho's same-sex marriage ban.

"The district court’s May 13, 2014 order is temporarily stayed pending this court’s disposition of appellants’ emergency motions for a stay pending appeal," declared the 9th U.S. Court of Appeals. - Idaho Statesman

In an historic ruling Tuesday, U.S. Magistrate Judge Candy Dale ruled Idaho's 2006 voter-approved ban on same-sex marriages unconstitutional.

The state of Idaho is fighting that ruling. In a written statement, Gov. C.L. "Butch" Otter says he appreciates that Idaho will not have to "endure the same kind of chaos and confusion that Utah faced after a similar lower-court decision."

“I appreciate the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals stepping in to ensure Idaho will not have to endure the same kind of chaos and confusion that Utah faced after a similar lower-court decision. Today’s ruling stays the federal magistrate’s order and maintains the status of marriage as defined by the Idaho Constitution – between one man and one woman. Meanwhile, I am proceeding with an aggressive challenge in the appellate court. I’m hopeful for a better outcome, but in any event I am committed to defending our Constitution and the will of Idaho voters.” - Gov. Otter

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday put the weddings on hold while it considers a request for a longer stay while the governor and attorney general appeal the case.

Deborah Ferguson is the Boise lawyer representing the eight plaintiffs in the case. She sees the temporary stay as a good sign. 

“If the 9th Circuit wanted to issue a stay, it could have done so immediately," says Ferguson. "But the fact that they're posting a temporary stay pending further consideration means they’re taking a hard look at it.”

Ferguson says there’s no way to know when the appellate court will issue its final decision to grant or reject the stay. It could be tomorrow or two weeks from now.

The four couples who sued to get Idaho's ban overturned had asked the court to allow the weddings to begin.

Gay marriage is legal in 17 states and the District of Columbia.

The Associated Press Contributed

Related Content

You make stories like this possible.

The biggest portion of Boise State Public Radio's funding comes from readers like you who value fact-based journalism and trustworthy information.

Your donation today helps make our local reporting free for our entire community.