© 2026 Boise State Public Radio
NPR in Idaho
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations
Donate Today
Amber and Rachael filed their lawsuit against Idaho in Nov. 2013. They were married Oct. 15, 2014.In November 2013, eight women -- four couples -- sued the state of Idaho over its 2006 voter-approved constitutional amendment that defines marriage as between one man and one woman.The plaintiffs, Susan Latta and Traci Ehlers, Lori Watsen and Sharene Watsen, Shelia Robertson and Andrea Altmayer, and Amber Beierle and Rachael Robertson, say Idaho's ban on same-sex marriage violates equal protection and due process guarantees.Two of the couples have been legally married in other states and two have tried to get Idaho marriage licenses and been denied.Their case went to U.S. Magistrate Judge Candy Dale in May 2014. On May 13, eight days after Dale heard the case, she struck down Idaho's same-sex marriage ban.Idaho Gov. C.L. "Butch" Otter and Attorney General Lawrence Wasden appealed that ruling in an effort to uphold Idaho's Constitution as approved by voters in 2006.On Oct. 7, 2014, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Dale's ruling, striking down Idaho's ban on same-sex marriage. After more than a week of legal challenges, same-sex marriages began Oct. 15, 2014 in Idaho.

Supreme Court's Gay Marriage Decisions Won’t Affect Idaho Law

U.S. Supreme Court

Law experts in Idaho say today’s decisions from the Supreme Court that strike down the Defense of Marriage Act and allow gay marriage to resume in California will have no effect on Idaho law.

Gay couples do not have the right to marry in Idaho.  Idaho passed a constitutional amendment in 2006 that says the only marriage the state will recognize is between a man and woman. 

Concordia University law professor Chad DeVeaux says while significant in states where gay marriage is legal, today’s rulings don’t change things in Idaho. 

“I don’t think it has a big impact,” he says. “Idaho is still at this point free to make its own choices.  Nothing that came down today will change that.”

Idaho Statesman political reporter Dan Popkey details Idaho’s history with gay marriage law and the decisions’ lack of an impact in the Gem State.

University of Idaho law professor Richard Seamon said the court made it clear in the DOMA decision that it was not invalidating any state marriage bans, including Idaho’s. But in the long run, Seamon said, the DOMA case could become part of the framework for a future court to overturn such prohibitions. “It’s another brick in the wall of the legal edifice building up against gay marriage bans”Seamon said. “A lot of the reasons could be used in future lawsuits challenging such bans.”

At Boise’s Concordia University, DeVeaux agrees.  He thinks the top court effectively put off a bigger decision while more and more states move towards recognizing gay marriage.  He says the Supreme Court made a similar move regarding desegregation before issuing its famous 1954 decision on Brown v. Board of Education.

“To me, the takeaway might be that the court will revisit this in a few years,” he says. “I think they might be reading the tea leaves on where the states might be going on this issue and they might feel more comfortable revisiting it in a few years.”

Meanwhile, Utah public radio station KUER has published reaction from the Mormon Church to today's rulings. The church says the rulings raise "troubling" questions about how the democratic and judicial systems operate.

Idaho's ACLU also issued a statement following the decisions.  The organization celebrated the court's DOMA ruling and says it will now work to figure out what it means for same-sex Idahoans who were legally married in other states. 

Copyright 2013 Boise State Public Radio

Related Content

You make stories like this possible.

The biggest portion of Boise State Public Radio's funding comes from readers like you who value fact-based journalism and trustworthy information.

Your donation today helps make our local reporting free for our entire community.