U.S. Supreme Court

"I can’t believe we’re a part of it … our tiny little ten person Idaho brand was represented at the Supreme Court.”

“We’re not investing in new hires. We’re not investing in growth. Every tariff increase means the risk of losing my home."

The Wyoming property owner is arguing it's trespassing to step over private land to access public land.

Public lands advocates worried that allowing Utah’s case to move forward would threaten to upend management of 200 million acres of public lands across the West.

For the most part, the justices still try to portray the court as amicable, but you don't have to be a genius to see that they are not exactly happy campers.

Fights over public lands aren’t unusual in the West. But Utah is now going straight to the U.S. Supreme Court to wrest control of 18.5 million acres of federal land.

An Idaho law barring women and girls who are intersex or transgender from participating in women’s sports is headed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Idaho Matters takes a look at a couple of cases that will have profound effects on the presidency and federal rules that can directly impact our everyday lives.

A U.S. Supreme Court ruling that evolved from a Boise case says cities can ban camping on public property – hear how local homeless shelters are responding.

The decision means cities can now enforce anti-camping bans in public even if not enough shelter beds are available, and could have major implications for how localities approach homelessness.